- Published on
Identity Theft Block Letter Template (FCRA §605B)

Table of Contents
- What a §605B identity-theft block actually does
- Required documentation: what you MUST include
- When to use §605B (vs §611 or other tools)
- Anatomy: what your §605B block letter must include
- Bureau identity-theft addresses (use these, not the standard dispute addresses)
- Sample §605B identity-theft block letter
- Common mistakes that get §605B requests rejected
- Also send a §623 letter to the furnisher
- How DisputeValet.com generates your identity-theft block letter
- Related reading
- Frequently asked questions
An identity-theft block letter is the document that forces a credit bureau to remove a fraud-caused item from your report under FCRA §605B — within four business days of receiving a valid identity-theft report. This page walks through exactly what that letter must contain, the documentation it has to travel with, the language that clears the statute's four-element test, and the mistakes that get these requests rejected. For the statute itself — how §605B works and how it compares to a §611 reinvestigation — see FCRA Section 605B explained.
DisputeValet.com generates the §605B block letter, lists the documentation that must accompany it, and produces a parallel letter to send to the furnisher under §623 so the underlying account is shut down — not just hidden from the report.
The rule in one sentence: A §605B block letter, sent with a valid identity-theft report, obligates the bureau to block the fraud item within four business days — this page shows exactly what that letter has to say.
What a §605B identity-theft block actually does
A §605B block is the strongest self-help tool in the FCRA for fraud-caused items. Once the bureau receives a complete identity-theft block request:
- Bureau must block within 4 business days. The item is hidden from your file pending verification.
- Bureau must notify the furnisher that the item has been blocked as identity theft.
- Furnisher may not continue to report it unless they affirmatively challenge the block with evidence that the item is NOT identity theft.
- The block survives indefinitely unless the bureau or furnisher overturns it with new evidence.
Compare this with the §611 reinvestigation path:
- §611 → bureau has up to 30 days, furnisher can re-verify and keep the item.
- §605B → bureau has 4 business days, burden shifts entirely to the furnisher to prove it isn't fraud.
For genuine identity-theft items, §605B is almost always the correct path.
Required documentation: what you MUST include
A §605B request is rejected without all of the following. This is not a place to cut corners — the bureau will refuse to process an incomplete block request:
- An identity-theft report. Either:
- The Identity Theft Report from IdentityTheft.gov (the FTC's free reporting tool), which includes a built-in affidavit, OR
- A police report filed with your local law-enforcement agency.
- Either is acceptable under §605B(a)(1) — the FTC report is faster to obtain.
- Proof of your identity. Copy of government-issued ID (driver's license, state ID, passport) AND proof of current address (utility bill, lease, mortgage statement) dated within the last 90 days.
- A statement, signed under penalty of perjury, that you did not authorize the disputed account or transaction. This is built into the IdentityTheft.gov affidavit.
- Specific identification of each item to be blocked — the furnisher name, account number as it appears on the report, the inquiry date if it's a hard inquiry, the docket number if it's a public record.
Send photocopies, never originals. Bureaus do not return mailed documents.
When to use §605B (vs §611 or other tools)
Use §605B when:
- An account was opened in your name without your authorization — credit cards, loans, utility services, etc.
- A hard inquiry appears on your report from a creditor you did not apply with.
- A public record (judgment, tax lien) was filed against an identity-theft-created account.
- You have already filed an identity-theft report with the FTC or local police.
Do NOT use §605B for:
- Items that are simply inaccurate but not fraud-caused (wrong date, wrong amount, mixed-file errors). Use §611 instead.
- Authorized accounts you regret opening. §605B requires that the account was not authorized by you.
- Items where you cannot or have not filed an identity-theft report. The report is mandatory documentation.
Filing a false identity-theft report is a federal crime. Only use §605B for items that genuinely resulted from identity theft.
Anatomy: what your §605B block letter must include
A compliant block request has seven required parts:
- Your full name, current address, date of birth, and the last four of your SSN.
- The bureau's name and the correct dispute / fraud address. Many bureaus route §605B letters through a different P.O. box than standard §611 disputes — DisputeValet.com auto-fills the correct fraud-specific address per bureau.
- A clear statement that this is a §605B identity-theft block request (not a §611 dispute) and that the items listed resulted from identity theft.
- An itemized list of the disputed items — for each: furnisher name, account number, date opened or inquiry date, brief description ("credit card account opened 2024-03-15", "hard inquiry from Lender X dated 2024-04-02").
- A reference to the attached identity-theft report (FTC or police), with a copy enclosed.
- A copy of your proof of identity and proof of address (photocopies).
- Your signature, the date, and the certified-mail tracking number.
Bureau identity-theft addresses (use these, not the standard dispute addresses)
- Equifax — Equifax Information Services LLC, Identity Theft Department, P.O. Box 105069, Atlanta, GA 30348
- Experian — Experian, P.O. Box 9554, Allen, TX 75013
- TransUnion — TransUnion LLC, Fraud Victim Assistance Department, P.O. Box 2000, Chester, PA 19016
If the fraud items appear on more than one bureau, send a separate complete block request to each affected bureau.
Sample §605B identity-theft block letter
The letter is worthless without the identity-theft report and identity documents attached — the block is granted on the documentation, not the wording. Its core request is one sentence:
"I am a victim of identity theft. Under Section 605B of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2), I request that you block the following information, which resulted from identity theft and which I did not authorize."
Around that you itemize each fraud item and list your enclosures — the FTC or police identity-theft report, your signed affidavit, photo ID, and proof of address — sent to the bureau's identity-theft address above. The full structure is in the checklist above.
Get the complete, ready-to-send §605B identity-theft block letter
DisputeValet.com fills in the full letter with your details, the correct bureau or furnisher address, and the applicable deadlines — then tracks the response so you know exactly when to follow up. The finished letters are part of the subscription; this page shows the key language only.
DisputeValet.com auto-fills the §605B language for multiple items at once, routes it to the correct bureau fraud address, and generates the parallel §623 furnisher letter in the same intake.
Common mistakes that get §605B requests rejected
- No identity-theft report attached. The FTC report or police report is mandatory. Without it the bureau will refuse to process.
- Filing §611 first, then trying §605B for the same item. Once a §611 result comes back "verified," it complicates a subsequent §605B. If you suspect fraud from the start, go directly to §605B.
- Submitting unsigned affidavits. The identity-theft statement must be signed under penalty of perjury. Unsigned = rejected.
- Missing proof-of-address documentation. A 90-day-old utility bill, lease, or mortgage statement is required. Old documents are rejected.
- Submitting copies through the bureau's online portal. The online portal does not always accept the documentation required for §605B. Certified mail with return receipt is the reliable path.
- Mixing fraud items with non-fraud disputes in the same letter. Send a separate §605B letter for fraud items and a separate §611 letter for any non-fraud accuracy disputes.
Also send a §623 letter to the furnisher
A §605B block hides the item from your credit report at the bureau level. To shut down the underlying account so the furnisher cannot continue to attempt collection or re-report it elsewhere, send a parallel letter directly to the furnisher under FCRA §623, citing the identity-theft report and demanding they close the account and cease all reporting. DisputeValet.com generates both letters from a single intake — the §605B block and the §623 furnisher notice.
How DisputeValet.com generates your identity-theft block letter
Open the Letter Builder, find the §605B identity-theft block template, and fill in:
- Your name, address, date of birth, last four of SSN
- The bureau(s) the fraud items appear on
- For each fraud item: furnisher name, account or inquiry details
- Upload or reference the identity-theft report and your proof of identity / address
DisputeValet.com auto-fills the §605B legal language, addresses the letter to the correct identity-theft-specific bureau address, generates a print-ready PDF, and produces the parallel §623 furnisher letter so you can shut down the underlying account in the same mailing cycle. The Advanced plan adds tracker entries so you can monitor the 4-business-day block window and log the bureau's confirmation automatically.
See template pricing → · Compare DIY dispute tools →
Related reading
- FCRA Section 605B explained — how the identity-theft block works, the four required elements, and §605B vs §611
- Bureau dispute letter (FCRA §611) — for non-fraud accuracy disputes
- Section 609 disclosure letters — request what's in your file before disputing
- Section 611 reinvestigation — the slower, weaker tool for fraud items
- Section 623 furnisher direct dispute — the parallel letter to send to the furnisher
- FTC IdentityTheft.gov — start here to get the required identity-theft report
Frequently asked questions
Can I use §605B without filing a police report?
Yes. The FTC's IdentityTheft.gov tool produces a built-in identity-theft affidavit that satisfies §605B's documentation requirement. A police report is also acceptable but not required if you've completed the FTC report.
Will the bureau notify the furnisher of the block?
Yes. §605B requires the bureau to notify the furnisher that the item has been blocked as identity theft. The furnisher then cannot continue to report it unless they affirmatively challenge the block with evidence that the item is not from fraud.
What if the furnisher challenges the block?
The bureau must investigate the challenge and may temporarily un-block the item while doing so. If the furnisher cannot prove the account was authorized, the block stands. If the furnisher produces convincing evidence the account was yours, the block is overturned. This is why parallel §623 notice to the furnisher matters — it puts them on direct notice and weakens any "we did not know" defense in subsequent litigation.
How long does the block last?
Indefinitely, unless overturned. The §605B block is permanent unless the bureau or furnisher produces evidence overturning it.
What if my identity-theft report is from 2 years ago — can I still use §605B?
There is no statutory time limit in §605B. The FTC and police reports do not expire for purposes of the block request. That said, fraud items often surface long after the underlying theft — many people only discover the fraud item years later when reviewing their credit report.
Do I need an attorney for §605B?
No. §605B is designed for self-help use; the documentation requirements are specific but achievable without legal counsel. If a furnisher refuses to honor the block or continues to attempt collection after notice, that is the point at which a consumer-protection attorney becomes valuable. DisputeValet.com is software you operate yourself, not a law firm.
Important Disclosure: DisputeValet.com provides educational materials and templates designed to help consumers understand their rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
• Templates are not legal advice and should not be considered a substitute for professional legal counsel
• Individual results will vary based on specific circumstances and credit situations
• Success stories and testimonials represent individual experiences and are not guarantees of similar outcomes
• DisputeValet.com is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act
• Users are solely responsible for their disputes and any outcomes resulting from using our templates
Table of Contents
- What a §605B identity-theft block actually does
- Required documentation: what you MUST include
- When to use §605B (vs §611 or other tools)
- Anatomy: what your §605B block letter must include
- Sample §605B identity-theft block letter
- Common mistakes that get §605B requests rejected
- Also send a §623 letter to the furnisher
- How DisputeValet.com generates your identity-theft block letter
- Related reading
- Frequently asked questions
Authors

- Name
- DisputeValet.com
Previous Article
Table of Contents
- What a §605B identity-theft block actually does
- Required documentation: what you MUST include
- When to use §605B (vs §611 or other tools)
- Anatomy: what your §605B block letter must include
- Sample §605B identity-theft block letter
- Common mistakes that get §605B requests rejected
- Also send a §623 letter to the furnisher
- How DisputeValet.com generates your identity-theft block letter
- Related reading
- Frequently asked questions
Authors

- Name
- DisputeValet.com
